Category: Uncategorized

Hey, they’re testing out consumer-level 1gbs to the customer service in Amsterdam’s network. (That’s 1 gig, ten times the current “fantasy way-cool” standard of 100 megs!) It’s not a commercial service yet but because the prices are falling for the electronics the folks who run the project have cobbled together a test to see how it works with off-the-shelf equipage.

Cutting to the chase: It works fine.

One of the best things about installing a fiber to the home infrastructure is that it makes substantial upgrades pretty trivial—the big sunk expense is in putting in the fiber infrastructure; future costs to stay abreast of newly available tech are, by comparison, cheap and can be done on an as-needed basis. Once you have fiber it is easy to stay ahead of the capacity curve and to supply vastly different needs. That is because the carrying capacity of light over fiber is theoretically unlimited; today the practical limits have to do mostly with economics: huge capacity routers and modems are costy and paying the interconnects to other networks can be pricy so providers have to charge more for such services than any but those with special needs want to pay.

But the one thing that is certain about life is that computer electronics prices fall (ok, death and taxes are two more things). And the plummeting price of 1gbs gear is what motivated Herman Wagter (manager of CityNet) in Amsterdam to patch together a working consumer-grade 1 gig connection and try it out in real life. The video I’ve linked to above is a tech head’s presentation—only a someone who delights in the details of hacking together a hookup and stressing it will find the video intrinsically interesting. For the rest of us any fascination lies in 1) the implications of what a residential-grade 1 gig connection might look like, 2) what you can do with it, 3) what the current practical limits are, and 4) what would be necessary for someone to get such a connection where you live.

1) What a residential-grade 1 gig connection might look like: today it involves patching past the modem in the commercially supplied box on the wall of your house and connecting the light signal to a special modem that translates it into 1 gig signal over copper. Basically you’ll need a special patch cord and a new modem. (The backbone already runs at higher speeds than your home connection can translate so all you need is new home electronics; the limit on modern fiber networks is mostly at the unit on the wall of your home.)

2) What you can do with it: Well, in the video they run four different HD video steams from their cable service simultaneously and saturate the download capacity of a computer without hitting the limit. Translation: you, your spouse and all the kids can do pretty much anything you can imagine without noticing the slightest slowdown. Even better: this is a symmetrical connection so you can serve up that sort of capacity too. Conceivably, for instance, you could cobble together a server with “football dad” videos from all the city’s high school teams and set it up to do Downloadble Video for the mere fans who’d like to see the whole thing in a replay that would allow them to pause the action and argue of whether little Johnny shoulda got credit for that tackle…. Or archive your video of the fishing rodeo. Or Mardi Gras in Acadiana. Or Festivals Acadiens et Créoles or Festival International. You could start a business archiving the monster video footage produced by those new “prosumer” video cameras for locals—wedding photographers on network might really be grateful. Your fantasy here:_________.

3) What the current practical limits are: Putting a gig modem in the stream at your house changes the network choke point from the electronics on the wall of your home to, likely, your home network and devices which might be built for the current (though fading) default of a 100 megs. Going in from that new gig modem connection: A) You’d want the network router to handle a gig. If it was purchased recently it probably does. Check. Longer runs of cabling might need to be changed out for CAT6 cabling. B) Any of the device that you connect to might be limited to a 100 megs or less (often labled: 10/100 ethernet). Again, check the sorts of connections that can really use bandwidth—mainly computers and set-top boxes. All my recent macs come equiped with 1 gig ethernet ports that I’ve never used to 1/10th capacity. PCs will be more variable. (Your wif? No. It can’t transmit enough bandwidth in the best case to use your gig of bandwidth. You do probably you want to upgrade to 802.11n if speed is important to you but even then any wireless connection will be a choke point. To take full advantage you’ll want a wired connection to bandwidth-hungry devices. If you live on wifi and are a true nut consider running two 802.11n connections on different bandwidths and tuning alternate devices to one or the other. Finally: your devices’ internal electronics will matter too. Even if you have a gig ethernet port you may well find that your hard drive’s controller can only handle 500 megs as it tries to write down that faster-than-real-time download from Netflix or iTunes…(poor, pitiful, you–this is the problem the guys in Amsterdam ran into. So sad.)

4) What would be necessary for someone to get such a connection where you live: Your first trick is to get hooked up to a fiber network (not one of those faux things from your incumbents). It would help to get it from a municipal or other small, local provider. The big guys are too focused on ringing the last dollar out of short-term investments. (Verizon is notoriously not offering to sell you nearly the capacity they have on their fiber network.) So move to Amsterdam. Or Lafayette…. Take Lafayette as a possilble example: You’d probably need to start by buying into a business contract and paying the premium involved. The 1 gig option is unlikely to be a standard one, at least not at first, so you’d have to sit down with LUS and hammer out a cost and agree on conditions. I suspect they’d be eager to be able to say that they’d sold such a residential connection, espeically if you are willing to pay for it. Even utility guys value bragging rights. They’d come to your house and either patch in a new modem in your box or, more likely, patch past it with a fiber-optic cable and connect it to a new gig modem in the house similar to the less powerful one you might get from the cable or phone guys. As far as you, the customer, was concerned that’d probably be it. On LUS’ side they’d probably want to patch past the PON splitter nearest your house so that your anticipated big bandwidth usage wouldn’t effect the other folks with whom you are currently sharing the backbone capacity. LUS assures us that they’ll install plenty of “excess” fiber all along their system to enable just such contingencies.

The take home from this post? — Getting a gig connection is no longer just a fuzzy fantasy. It’s easy to see how, in at least a few real-world situations, Joe Normal could snag a gigabit connection.

Brave New World, no?

UPDATE: As I went to post this article I recalled a remark I’d read on the Cook list about Lund, Sweden…when I went there I found that on that muni network you can TODAY buy a gig connection if you want. One provider, Adamo, sells it for 1495 Kr or about $221.37US. My. You can get the first month for half price to see if you like it. (See for yourself. I had to use Google translate but the meaning isn’t ambiguous.)

The Wall Street Journal carries an interesting story about broadband—one pitched at the level of titans—and the emerging battle between the cable and phone companies for customers’ retail business. The story’s title is a little misleading since there has only been a bit of movement toward price competition. The Wall St. Journal maven, however, sees price competition in his tarot cards based largely on the fact that in the last quarter the cablecos scored a big win over the telecos, bringing in 75% of new subscribers.

Normally this story wouldn’t qualify for an LPF comment but the implications for our community’s fiber network turn out to be interesting….and heartening. The analysts think that winning at internet connectivity is the key. (And, hey, we think so here too.) The juicy parts:

As bandwidth-hungry applications like video downloads grow, customers prefer the generally faster speeds cable offers. Cable companies have also been marketing more aggressively in recent months, analysts say.

“Phone companies can’t just sit back and let cable companies take that much of the broadband market, or they will eventually cede everything,” says John Hodulik, an analyst at UBS.

Winning broadband customers has enormous strategic consequences for both cable and phone companies. It gives them a foot in the door to sell other services, such as pay-TV and phone service.

The reason that internet subs are so strategically crucial?

Mr. Hodulik says customers are most apt to get phone and TV services from the same company that provides them with their broadband connection. And broadband services are also the most profitable of the bundled services.

So on this analysis, people are deciding which service to go with based on who can give them the best (and cheapest) broadband connection. Then they buy onto the other offered services.

That bodes well for LUSFiber which will have, without question, the best and cheapest data network in town.

Looking forward to January?

Well, we dodged the bullet here in Lafayette. While the storm came directly over Lafayette as a category 1 storm, damage seems less than I would have feared. Which is not to say that there is no serious damage. Big trees are down on my street and all over town. There is some wind damage to roofs. We’ll all be out with chainsaws soon.

Thing is, this hurricane is in the range of storms that we (and I expect those living in other hurricane-vulnerable areas) consider normal. It’s bad – but normal and expectedly bad. What happened in New Orleans during Katrina and what happened in Lake Charles during Rita was not in the range of normal and we on the coast now feel relieved to merely get hurt badly.

What would be felt to be a major disaster by anyone outside a Gulf coastal zone is greeted with gratitude by those of us living here. 🙂

We have our rituals that give us feelings of control and competence, however illusory. You stock up before the storm with ice, charcoal, and nonperishable foods. Trim branches away from the house that might beat on the roof. Pick up the yard and put away or tie down anything loose. Cover large windows. Everyone has their pattern before the storm. Then when the storm forces you indoors, you have another set of rituals: freeze big bags of water in the freezer to give it mass for when the power goes out. Mix up drink mixers. Watch TV and surf the net till the power goes. Break out the mixers and liquor. Watch the trees whip around – especially those you know are brittle (like pecans) or have shallow root systems (like water oaks). Wait for the eye to pass. Go out into the streets during the eye and talk excitedly with the neighbors. Wait for the wind to change directions. Watch the trees whip around again. The point is that we know what to do and just do it. Now’s the time for gassing up the chainsaw and cutting the limbs up to regulation size and dragging them to the street (or, in my case, to the compost area).

Long story short: we’re ok. Hit hard but know what to do about it – not hit so hard that it’s hard to cope.

Best wishes for all in the path of Hannah….

Lafayette Pro Fiber is happily aware of the friends of Lafayette who follow our progress here through the LPF blog and suspect that they will be concerned with the effects of Hurricane Gustav. On the downside: this will be a serious storm in Lafayette with the city getting sustained hurricane force winds. We anticipate some damage to homes and businesses, downed power and communication lines, trees down, and lots of large limbs stripped out of older trees. The power will likely be out for days. On the upside: well, this is a much better story than we were telling ourselves a few days ago. Gustav was a category 2 storm at landfall; earlier we were anticipating a 3 or even 4. There is a lot of difference and the upshot is that Lafayette will “only” get category 1 hurricane force winds. That is not out of the range of the experience of the people who live here—a big storm but not a monster. A category 2 storm would likely have brought down structures that survived lesser storms and produced an unprecedented amount of damage. So this bad storm is not as bad as feared.

Yes, we will probably lose some of the newly installed fiber; the area being built out now is predominantly aerial—it’s in the older central core—and some poles will come down. However the fiber is apparently actually tougher to bring down than the power, phone, or cable lines that run beside it on the poles. I’d read that in other places and a recent tornado in a the center-city “oil center” retail area confirmed it. Delay in the LUSFiber launch? We’ll see.

At any rate: I expect to lose power and connectivity as the eyewall passes. Happy to answer any questions in the comments as long as I’m up. See you on the other side.

Geoff Daily takes off on the cable companies’s deceptive practice of rebranding their hybrid fiber-coax networks as “fiber-powered” or “The New Face of Fiber” or some such nonsense. The point, of course, is to confuse the public about the quality of their network in comparison to a real (no hyphen) fiber network. We’ve complained about the same in these pages.

No surprise to those from Lafayette, his immediate inspiration is Cox advertising in his locale where, when questioned, the Cox spokeswoman denies that it means that Cox is about to go all-fiber-optic: “”It just means we’ve always had fiber.” So what’s this “new” face business meant to imply?

Geoff is offended. But instead of just comlaining he hopes to act. To that end he wants to lodge a complaint of deceptive advertising with the FCC. He’d like your help:

To that end, I’d like to put out an open invitation to anyone who’s reading to start keeping an eye out for suspect-looking cable ads. Any time you see a TV or radio ad, billboard or newspaper ad where your incumbent cableco is touting its fiber optics, try to capture it in some way. Record it, take a picture, or even just write down the words, and then start adding this material as comments to this post.

If we can collect enough evidence, I’ll take this cause right to the FTC to see what I can get done to stop this unethical practice.

Because if you’re like me and believe fiber is our future, we can’t sit passively on the sidelines any more and allow this deception to continue happening.

If I weren’t out of Lafayette I’d take a pic of the “advanced fiber now” billboard on Evangeline Thruway south of Johnston/Louisiana and snip some of those Cox “fiber” ads off my TiVo to send him.

Anybody help me out?

Tim Wu, one of the country’s most prominent copyright and net neutrality warriors, has a worthwhile op-ed piece in the New York Times today. Some of the nifty bits:

AMERICANS today spend almost as much on bandwidth — the capacity to move information — as we do on energy. A family of four likely spends several hundred dollars a month on cellphones, cable television and Internet connections, which is about what we spend on gas and heating oil.

Just as the industrial revolution depended on oil and other energy sources, the information revolution is fueled by bandwidth. If we aren’t careful, we’re going to repeat the history of the oil industry by creating a bandwidth cartel.

Like energy, bandwidth is an essential economic input. You can’t run an engine without gas, or a cellphone without bandwidth. Both are also resources controlled by a tight group of producers, whether oil companies and Middle Eastern nations or communications companies like AT&T, Comcast and Vodafone. That’s why, as with energy, we need to develop alternative sources of bandwidth…

Ok, that’s enough of a teaser. Go read the essay. I will only say that Lafayette should have been mentioned when he brought up Utah and Amsterdam. Suffice it to say that Mr. Wu thinks Lafayette’s solution to the bandwidth monopoly is a good one.

Saturday I spun out an extended bit on AT&T wanting to get into home networking—and had some ideas about what home networking might mean for LUS and Lafayette. AT&T is not alone in trying to extend its reach. According to LightReading a lot of companies are trying to figure out a way to smooth out the home networking experience. The purpose, of course, is to make networking fast enough and easy enough to implement to create a larger market for their product.

LUS supplier Alcatel-Lucent is among that number. The relevant paragraph:

And Cisco isn’t the only company with the living room built into its strategy — Alcatel-Lucent (NYSE: ALU – message board) recently announced the acquisition of remote broadband management player Motive Inc. (Nasdaq: MOTV – message board), which, according to AlcaLu, has developed “solutions allowing better visibility into home networks.” (See AlcaLu Gets Motivated and AlcaLu to Buy Motive.)

Interesting.

Don’t suppose LUS could be interested?

The venerable WSJ puts out a pretty even-handed review of the contending sides of the municipal fiber to the home movement. There’s a succienct summary of the necessary background–from the US’s falling rankings in internet connectivity to the desire for towns and small cities to boost growth, to the needs of small business for reasonably priced bandwidth, to the consistent objections of incumbent providers.

The story takes off from the case of Chattanooga which is working toward installing its own FTTH network. Chattanooga is being sued by Cox and other cable companies–which is no surprise to Lafayette’s citizens. (At issue there too is the incumbents’ reliance on a new state law that forbids “cross subsidization.”) The story closes with the following on-target quote:

“The issue is, does our community control our own fate,'” says Mr. DePriest. “Or does someone else control it?”